This means people will sometimes need to convert their WebP images to a more universally accepted format, like PNG. Software: Sharing, displaying, and editing WebP images can be tricky because the format isn’t universally compatible with all software - at least, not yet.On the plus side, IE users will still see non-WebP versions of the same image. Web Compatibility: While modern browsers like Chrome and Firefox do support WebP, older browsers, such as Internet Explorer (IE), don’t.Compression is still compression: While WebP images are much better at retaining image quality when they’re compressed, even a small amount of compression can reduce the quality of an image – even if it’s invisible to the naked eye.Transparency: Similar to PNG files, WebP supports transparent backgrounds.Flexible formats: WebP is a chameleon - it supports both lossless (like a PNG) and lossy (like a JPEG, slight quality loss for smaller file size) compression.The fact that they can be so heavily compressed while losing very little image quality is great for creating fast-loading web pages. Smart compression: A WebP file is 86% smaller than a JPEG and 43% smaller than a PNG, according to Ke圜DN.So what’s the point of using WebP? And if WebP is so great, why isn’t it used everywhere? Well, as with all things, WebP has its own set of pros and cons: Although the file type was created back in 2010, it is yet to be as widely adopted as other image file formats. If you’ve not heard of WebP until recently, then you’re not the only one. Created by Google, WebP was designed to keep pictures and images looking sharp but with a much smaller file size than traditional formats like JPEG or PNG. In the world of digital images, WebP is like the new kid on the block.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |